Is War Good or Bad Essay

The ongoing debate, is contend uncorrupted or bad? unremarkably if we see or hear the script fight we study about the dis bothow sides first. in that location is a saying that a forest fire burns everything in its path and it does destroy the forest just now out of the ashes lessens peeled life. War is confusable to this. Out of desolation comes a new beginning. A agricultural can arrive at from fight, by gaining riches or freedom, change magnitude in power, and advancing in engineering science. provided the reason why war seems and negative is because there is withal destruction where millions of innocent sight die, losing their resources and time, and also their money. non only within the unsophisticated however the whole world could be unnatural by war economically and socially.There argon plenty of reasons why war is a bad thing. One of import thing that comes to us directly and sorely is the death of the loved ones. Wars may conclude problems but in the process it kills millions of wad so war is cruel. A good sample is the WW2, almost 50-60 million people died. Also in a war, the artless has to spend a lot of money. It necessitate to provide weapons like tanks missiles etc., and it needs as many troops as possible. As Chinese strategist Tzu Sun said, Where the troops is, prices are high when prices rise the wealth of the people is exhausted (Tzu Sun, c.400 BCE). For the citizens this is very thwart because all this money would eventually come from raised taxes and instead this could be played out on poor and uneducated people. As I said, war brings destruction. Inflation is also a problem. For example subsequently the Angolas Civil War, their currency was so unreal that bottles of beer replaced it. Special landmarks, farms, and firms could be destroyed and the countrified could lose a lot of its resources. aft(prenominal) the war, usually the countrified goes in a huge debt.On the other hand, war could be seen as a positivist influence. Wars exist because people cannot agree on something. After the war it could be dismiss and they would agree and not fight any much. sometimes war could give freedom to a country. After war the country could choke more mighty. If the war was because of land, after they come along they have a bigger country with more resources. These resources could make the parsimoniousness of the country rocket up. Also war in short-term is actually good for the economy. For example during the Great Depression, unemployment rate decreased. Since they need enceinte amounts of weapons made quickly they hire more people and this leads to more jobs. Long-term immaterial a war could rebuild the economy of a country. Like the French, their production grew sudden after WW1 and WW2. The country develops in technology too. They would need better more powerful strategies and weapons than the enemys so they question and develop in technology. Afterwards, this would benefit the c ountry greatly.Could this debate ever be everyplace? I do not think back so. As you can see, there are many bad and good sides of war. overall I think wars are bad, because all these positive things are still not worth of millions of lives. And the good sides are if you coax the war but that is not hundred% sure. And even if things are resolved after the war, we are humans and we constantly neediness more. If the countries do not feel well-to-do they might go into a blurb war and then a ternary and so on. So I think we should always find more calm ways than war.